SAS Update - Caporicci & Larson - San Diego, Orange County, Oakland, and Sacramento

During 2005 and 2006, the American Institute ofA greater understanding of the entity is required.
Certified Public Accountants issued several newAuditors are no longer able to assess control risk at
standards to improve and clarify auditing standards inmaximum without a basis for that determination.
general.There are several steps auditors must take in
There were two statements that were issued andapplying the Risk Assessment Standards.
became effective upon issuance:Gathering Information - The auditors must begin with
Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) Numbers 102gathering information about the entity and its
and 103.environment, including its internal control. Information
SAS No.102, Defining Professional Requirements ingathering should include at minimum information
Statement on Auditing Standards, clarifies steps inobtained from external factors; information about the
auditing standards that are "unconditionalnature of the client; information in connection with
requirements" defined by works such as "must" andthe objectives and strategies and related business
"is required to"; and steps that are "presumptivelyrisks of the client; information regarding the client's
mandatory requirements" defined by words such asmeasurement parameters including a review of the
"should".client's financial performance; and information in
SAS No. 103, Audit Documentation, provides guidanceconnection with the client's internal controls.
on audit documentation as an essential element ofUnderstand the Entity - The auditor must also
audit quality. This standard also gives guidance on theunderstand the entity and its environment, including
date of the audit report which cannot be earlier thanits internal control. The auditor must anticipate and
the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficientevaluate what could go wrong, and be able to
appropriate audit evidence to support the opinion. Assynthesize the information gathered to determine
a result, the audit report date will need to be closehow it might affect the financial statements. The
to the date the reports are releasedauditor must also evaluate the design of the client's
The American Institute of Certified Publiccontrols and determine if those controls have been
Accountants also issued the Risk Assessmentimplemented (which is different than test of controls).
standard in March 2006. The project originated as aIn evaluating whether controls have been
joint project with SAS No. 99, Consideration of Fraudimplemented, the auditor should determine if there is
in a Financial Statement Audit. These standards werean awareness of the existence of the procedure in
issued because the Accounting Standards Boardquestion and if the staff implementing the control
believes that they will strengthen auditing standardshave a working knowledge of how the procedure
and provide a more in depth understanding of theshould be performed.
entity and its environment, a more rigorousAssess Risk - The auditor must assess the risk of
assessment of material misstatements and improvedmaterial misstatement by identifying risks throughout
linkage between assessed risk and the nature, timingthe process, relate the identified risks to what can go
and extent of audit procedures performed.wrong at the relevant assertion level and consider
The following standards are in the suite of SASswhether the risks could result in a material
issued in connection with the Risk Assessmentmisstatement to the financial statements. Once
standards:"significant risks" have been identified, the auditor can
SAS No. 104 - Amendment to SAS No.1- Codificationthen design audit procedures accordingly.
of Auditing Standards and ProceduresDesign Audit Procedures - The auditor should design
SAS No. 105 - Amendment to SAS No.95 - Generallyoverall responses and further audit procedures at
Accepted Auditing Standardsboth the financial statement level, and the relevant
SAS No. 106 - Audit Evidenceassertion level. In designing audit procedures, the
SAS No. 107 - Audit Risk and Materiality in Conductingauditor must provide and document a clear linkage
and Auditbetween the assessment of the risk of material
SAS No. 108 - Planning and Supervisionmisstatement and the nature, timing and extent of
SAS No. 109 - Understanding the Entity and Itsthe further audit procedures.
Environment and Assessing the Risks of MaterialSummary : Caporicci & Larson Report -- During 2005
Misstatementand 2006, the American Institute of Certified Public
SAS No. 110 - Performing Audit Procedures inAccountants issued several new standards to
Response to Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Auditimprove and clarify auditing standards in general.
Evidence ObtainedThere were two statements, concerning SAS 102
SAS No. 111- Amendment to SAS No. 39 - Auditand SAS 103.
Sampling